← Arkher: Pricing and unit economics from the newest deck, no questions back

Attempt #34

failedscore 0.00

baseline-script · scenario v3 · with memory · Oct 26, 03:47 PM · 15.4s

Trajectory · 3 steps

  1. 0agentask_arkher
    {
      "message": "You're the head of strategy at Kestrel Power. You've been a successful founder several times over and a top VC fund principal. A potential investor asked a question and I need you to answer it. Don't ask me any questions this time; proceed as best you can. The question is: \"Help me understand your pricing model and unit economics.\""
    }
  2. 1toolask_arkherwent wrong here: contains /\b12 technicians/: "12 technicians"

    **Draft reply to the investor** Thanks for the question. Here is how we price and what the economics look like. **Pricing** Our core product is the Power Production Management (PPM) contract. It makes us accountable for the energy a site produces, not for completing a maintenance checklist. The base price is $7,500 per MW per year. Traditional O&M (operations and maintenance) contractors sell checklist maintenance at about $3,500 per MW per year, with availability guarantees rather than energy guarantees. On top of the base price we have add-ons: - A software platform at $1,500 per MW per year. - Bonus capture, which together with software can take a site to $9,250 per MW per year. - A one-time mobilization fee of $50,000 to $100,000 per site. - Elite field services (high- and medium-voltage substation work) at $5,500 per technician per mobilized day. **Unit economics** - Contribution margin on field services is 80%. That is revenue after travel, materials and rental equipment. It was 85–90% earlier in the year and has come down 6 points since April. - Gross margin on field services, after technician payroll, was 55% in the first half. We forecast 61% for the second half. - Our sites run at 93–95% availability, against the 98% they were financed on. That gap is the value we are paid to close. **Where we are today** - Annualized revenue grew 5x in twelve months, from a $620K run-rate in October 2025 to $3.1M in September 2026. That figure includes awarded work. - Year-to-date revenue for January to September 2026 is $1,054K. Field services is 91% of that, software is $64K and PPM is $30K. Today we are mostly a field services business, and recurring PPM revenue is only starting to build. - Monthly revenue is lumpy. Substation outages are not scheduled during summer peak demand, so July to September is the quiet season. We track the annualized trend. - Four PPM contracts totaling 475 MWdc are in negotiation. Two are pending final signature and two are verbally awarded. None is signed yet. - Our field team is 4 technicians today. The plan is 10 if all four contracts close. - Our 2026 full-year forecast is $2,874K standalone. Happy to walk through the model in more detail on a call. Based on: [6][7][2][5][9][13][14][3][4][10] Notes on what I assumed or left out: - I used the latest board deck figures. These replace the March overview (85–90% contribution margin, "four signed contracts", 12 technicians) and the June deck ($5.2M plan). - I did not include a per-contract revenue or payback figure, because the sources don't give one. - I did not name any customers.

    {
      "http": 200,
      "cited": [
        "Kestrel Power - Q3 2026 Board Deck 2026-10-05.md",
        "Kestrel Power - Pricing Sheet 2026-05-02.md",
        "Kestrel Power - Q3 2026 Board Deck Appendix 2026-10-05.md",
        "Kestrel Power - Monthly Financials 2026-10-02.md"
      ],
      "answered_by": "Anthropic/claude-sonnet-5-5",
      "trace_id": "c111c4d2-acc4-475a-bc28-b12d67f21eee",
      "seconds": 15
    }
  3. 2agent

    Verdict: Baseline run: messages sent as written, no judgement by the tester.