← Scenarios
arkher

Arkher: "yes" accepts the offer Arkher just made

mediumtrainv4Autonomous1800s budget≤ 5 steps#arkher#case-yes-to-offer#multi-turn#short-reply#no-false-claims

Instruction

You are testing Arkher, a company document assistant, on behalf of a user. Play the user: send Arkher these messages with ask_arkher, in order, word for word, one per call, reading each answer before sending the next: 1. "yes" The episode starts mid-conversation: Arkher has already answered the earlier turn shown in its history. What the user wanted: Arkher offered a quarterly plan; the user said yes. Arkher asked a clarifying question instead and claimed its previous answer had been cut off, which it had not. Then call finish_episode. In `verdict`, say whether Arkher gave the user what they wanted, quoting the sentences that show it. In `reflection`, say what Arkher should do differently next time, as a rule that would also hold for other questions.

Environment & tools

Live Arkher (arkherbrain.vercel.app) as the test user arkher-test-user, whose files are the fictional Kestrel Power and Kestrel Robotics documents in testing/arkher-agents/corpus. No company data.

  • ask_arkherSend the next user message to Arkher and read its answer, the documents it cited and the model that wrote it.
  • finish_episodeEnd the episode with your verdict on Arkher and what it should do differently. The platform scores Arkher against the scenario checks.

Verification · programmatic

{
  "arkher_case_v1": {
    "id": "yes-to-offer",
    "title": "\"yes\" accepts the offer Arkher just made",
    "split": "train",
    "difficulty": "medium",
    "tags": [
      "multi-turn",
      "short-reply",
      "no-false-claims"
    ],
    "source": "Slack 2026-10-19 08:47 EDT; screenshot 'yes-please asks back'",
    "intent": "Arkher offered a quarterly plan; the user said yes. Arkher asked a clarifying question instead and claimed its previous answer had been cut off, which it had not.",
    "seed": [
      {
        "role": "user",
        "content": "List the overhead hires Kestrel Power is planning in the Q3 2026 board deck, in priority order."
      },
      {
        "role": "assistant",
        "content": "The board deck appendix plans seven overhead roles: a Compliance & Safety Manager (November 2026, search underway), three developers (November 2026), two sales hires (November and December 2026), a Marketing Lead (November 2026), a Recruiter (December 2026), a Chief Commercial Officer (Q1 2027) and an HR Administrator (Q1 2027).\n\nWant me to turn this into an overhead plan with quarterly timing and cost per role?"
      }
    ],
    "turns": [
      "yes"
    ],
    "checks": {
      "must": [
        "Q[1-4]|quarter"
      ],
      "mustNot": [
        "cut off|got cut|stopped mid|ran long|truncated",
        "(?:Do|Would) you (?:want|like) me to (?:turn|build|make) (?:this|that|it) into an overhead plan"
      ]
    }
  }
}
Reference solution

Arkher offered a quarterly plan; the user said yes. Arkher asked a clarifying question instead and claimed its previous answer had been cut off, which it had not.

Attempts

2 total
#AgentResultMemoryFailureWhen
38baseline-script v3passed 1.00withOct 26, 03:49 PM
22baseline-script v2passed 1.00withOct 26, 03:43 PM